DFI Labs

Methodology

Research is the edge.

At DFI Labs, a robust systematic signal is not a narrative: it is the output of a disciplined research process. This page describes how we develop and validate quantitative research models, methods and data infrastructure for authorised asset managers and institutional counterparties.

1. Data infrastructure

Quantitative research begins with trustworthy data. We ingest and normalise tick-level order-book data, trade prints, on-chain flows, derivatives positioning, funding rates, basis, and ancillary reference data across a curated universe of deeply liquid spot pairs on tier-one venues. All data are stored in a time-series warehouse with strict point-in-time discipline: every backtest and historical model evaluation uses only the information available at the corresponding historical moment.

Automated diagnostics test research-data quality. Gaps, outliers and venue outages are tagged, not silently imputed. Our research code treats missing data as first-class information rather than a nuisance to be papered over.

2. Signal generation

Our signal library spans three families:

3. Validation discipline

A signal that looks good in-sample is not a signal. We impose:

What we do not do. We do not publish curve-fit backtests. We do not leverage performance numbers that depend on venues or products we do not use. We do not promise returns.

4. Model exposure design

For research purposes, signals are translated into hypothetical exposure profiles using optimisation methods that account for expected return, realised and forecast covariance, turnover, capacity and documented constraints. We prefer simple, explainable methods: every hypothetical model exposure must be attributable to an identifiable combination of signal, assumption and bound. Any actual position or order decision is made independently by the authorised manager.

5. Implementability

A research model that cannot be evaluated realistically is not useful. Each hypothetical exposure profile is assessed against slippage assumptions, participation-rate limits and capacity bounds so an authorised manager can perform its own independent assessment. DFI Labs does not execute orders, operate order-routing infrastructure or determine positions in client accounts.

6. Risk & governance

Risk diagnostics form part of model research and validation. During research validation, DFI Labs' tooling tests model outputs against documented research parameters; it does not monitor, supervise or control client portfolios or accounts. Any live pre-trade or post-trade risk control, order decision and supervisory response is carried out solely by the authorised manager.

Research governance is treated with the same seriousness as model risk: written methodology, documented decisions, continuity testing for our own research infrastructure and periodic review.

7. Research culture

Finally, methodology is only as good as the culture that sustains it. We run weekly research reviews, maintain a peer-critique requirement before any signal promotion, and track a living postmortem of decisions that did not work as expected, because improvement requires naming what broke. Small team, flat organisation, written thinking.

Want the detail behind the method?

We are happy to walk authorised asset managers and institutional counterparties through our research process under appropriate confidentiality. Conversations are best had on a call.